Stop Losing Bidsto Incomplete Specs
RFQs hide requirements across 300 pages. Our AI finds what standard review misses—before you submit.
Client asked for
5 analyzers, standard industrial spec
What AI actually found
Cost of missing this
$340K change order
Reduce review time, improve decision quality, and submit stronger bids with less risk
Ready to see it on your RFQs?
See this on your own documents
We'll run a live session with your actual RFQs. No setup, no commitment.
Book a meetingWalkthrough of the live product on a real 312-page RFQ
AI extracts requirements across appendices and tag sheets
Configuration assembled from your component library
Three scope gaps surfaced with the constraint they violate
The real cost
The $2M Mistake
Scope gaps found after contract award cost you:
Cost of scope gaps by stage
AI review cost
rework + delays
avg. per incident
Finding a gap during review costs a fraction of finding it after award. The earlier you catch it, the cheaper the fix.
From RFQ to bid — the real product, on simulated customer data
A walkthrough of the live Contract Intelligence product running on a simulated oil & gas RFQ. Watch AI extract requirements, assemble a configuration, and prove or break feasibility — end to end.
Want to see this on your own RFQs?
We'll run a live session with your actual documents. No setup. No commitment.
Why configuration gaps are expensive
Specs hidden across appendices
Requirements appear in body text, tag data sheets, area classification drawings, and cross-referenced appendices. Each document adds constraints the next one depends on.
Interdependencies that aren't obvious
An area classification drawing mandates enclosure certification. A process stream count mandates a sample line count. These connections only appear when you read every document together.
Scope gaps found after award
A proposal based on an incomplete read of the RFQ creates scope gaps that surface during engineering. By then the contract is signed and the cost is yours.
Proved, not estimated
Most review processes rely on a person reading the draft against the RFQ by hand. Neurosymbolic reasoning returns a mathematical proof — either the configuration satisfies the spec, or it doesn't.
Ready to see this on your projects?
Run this on your
actual pipeline.
Schedule a 30-minute technical demo where we run a live analysis on an actual RFQ from your pipeline — with your engineering team on the call.
Book your technical demo
30 minutes · live RFQ analysis · your engineering team
What happens next
We review your submission
Within 24 hours — we confirm fit and send a calendar link
You pick a 30-minute slot
Video call with our engineering team, at your convenience
Live analysis on your RFQ
Bring your most complex recent project document
Pilot discussion
If there's a fit, we scope a custom pilot on your next bid
Not ready to commit to a demo?
⏰ Pilot slots for Q2 2026 are limited — 3 DCS manufacturers onboarding this quarter.